Archive for the ‘European Institutions’ Category

Association Agreements between the European Union and Latin America

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Acuerdos de Asociación Europa-América Latina: Socios privilegiados o tratados de libre comercio? – RLF Brussels, 2010

Association Agreements with Latin America are increasingly pushed by the European Union. The brochure “Association Agreements European Union – Latin America – Privileged partnerships or Free Trade Agreements?” gives insights into impacts of Association Agreements with the EU on specific sectors, such as agrofuels, water and energy, investments and services, analyses the negotiation processes between the European Union and the Andean Region, and explaines the political context of the probably soon be signed EU-Central American Association Agreement.

The authors are academic researchers and/or associated with civil society organisations that are active in the Hemispheric Social Alliance, a network that originated in the opposition to the American Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA, span. ALCA).

The studies in detail: El Savador (context of EU-Central American Association Agreement and study on anticipated outcomes for micro and meso enterprises), Costa Rica (legal and institutional changes for energy and water), Nicaragua and Guatemala (changing role of agrofuels and impact on association agreements), Colombia and Peru (negotiation processes of association agreements and general overview on experiences with trade agreements in Latin America), Bolivia (role of social movements in the negotiation process), Chile and Mexico (experiences with free trade agreements, impact on investments and services).

Website of brochure with download »

Left Alternatives to End Poverty in Europe

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Nicolás Muzi (Brussels) – Exceeding all expectations, a critical mass of over 50 people (a milieu of left-wing social actors, academics, politicians, radical intellectuals and employees of the European Institutions) got together on 1st March 2010 to discuss a key issue of the European Left political agenda: fighting poverty in the European Union. Under the framework of the 2010 European Year against poverty sponsored by the European Commission, the Transform! Working Group Brussels organised a debate to explore Left alternatives for the fight against poverty in the “First World”, held in the Garcia Lorca Centre, a historic gathering place of the critical Left in Brussels (home of Spain’s Communist Party during Franco’s dictatorship).

(more…)

The European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI)

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

ecilogoOn the 31st of March 2010 the European Commission adopted its long expected “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens’ initiative“. Advocates of the Lisbon-Treaty pointed to this one element as a great step forward towards a truly citizen centered European integration. Now the question raises: what about “the small print”, the administrative implementation rules?

A detailed critical analysis of this policy instrument
by Michael Efler: PDF-file
Related Blog: http://www.citizens-initiative.eu/
Proposal by the European Commission: PDF-file

The European Commission – Target of a Gigantic Lobby Industry

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

image_previewThe liberal theory of the political system resembles the neo-classical concept of the market: If all act in their interests, the public good will in the end emerge strengthened from the process. Of course, general rules must apply, but basically, everyone should be allowed to promote his or her own interests to their best ability. Looking at the reality in the centre of European politics one might have second thoughts about this. The European Parliament and, even more so, the European Commission, have become the main targets of a gigantic lobby industry. Washington is the only place where more lobbyists are to be found.

(more…)

The Design Flaws of the Eurozone

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Not long ago, the columnists of the major newspapers would not in their wildest dreams have been able to imagine the events happening today. The taxpayers of the two largest European countries, Germany and France, are to help Greece out of its macroeconomic mess. But no! The word “macro-economics” is quite wrong here, because that makes it sound like rational policy. But: Greece necessarily reacts to its “social environment”, which is the international community. And that is structured by rules and by relationships of power and exchange. Here, certain groups with their institutions rule over other groups – be they the lower classes of their own countries, or other countries which have a lower level of technological development in the international division of labour.

(more…)

The Things that get Passed Around in Brussels Street Cafés…

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

passbild

Nobody knows how it happened, but somehow a confidential EU Commission document has made its way through obscure pathways into the hands of the interested Brussels public. In this document titled “A Reform Agenda for Global Europe”, the previous debates between the Parliament, the Council and the Commission for a financial audit in 2008-‘09 are summarised, and suggestions for a reform of the budget starting in 2013 are made.

(more…)

From Lima to Madrid: Hearing in the European Parliament

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Witnesses of human rights abuses by European Transnational Corporations in Latin America presented their cases in the European Parliament at the 18th of November 2009. In preparation of the People’s Permanent Tribunal (TPP) at the alternative EU-LAC summit, 14-18 May 2010 in Madrid, e.g. Brazilian Fisher of a bay near Rio de Janeiro showed how a Thyssen-Krupp steel plant infringes environmental law with the result of displacing local fisher. The situation is tense: on the one side, the fisher are organising themselves; on the other side, the companies’ security service is enunciating death threats against the fisher.

(more…)

A German Problem: The Brussels Leadership

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

The crisis, so it seems, is not present in Europe – and certainly not in Germany before the elections. The news of job cuts, bankruptcies and the over-indebtedness of public budgets are hidden in the business papers such as the Handelsblatt and the Financial Times, while Mr Steinbrück and Ms Merkel regularly come up with good, meaningless news from Brussels and the G20 meetings.

There is deep silence in Brussels: Yes, a European bank supervisory body is under consideration; yes, a recommendation for the limitation of managers’ salaries is being formulated. And the new Central European member nations, which are in a very difficult situation, in some cases verging on national bankruptcy, will get small subsidies – ridiculously small, considering the magnitude of their problems. But there is no coordinated common strategy against the crisis. When France took an initiative in this direction during its Council Presidency in December 2008, it was briskly reined in by Germany. Oh yes, and at the same time, the heads of governments have, by the way, authorized themselves the suspension of the debt limit in the convergence rules. Renationalisation is in the cards. This is monstrous, in view of the existing economic integration in the EU.

returnAs the great economist Paul Krugman wrote in the preface to the German edition of his book “The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008″, Europe needs a massive, coordinated effort. Given the transnationality of major corporations, the integrated national economies of Europe will, he argues, under no circumstances be able to solve their problems nationally. He even refers to a German problem:

“For incomprehensible reasons, Germany’s leading politicians simply seem not to understand the enormous extent of the crisis, or the necessity for a forceful reaction to it.” (Krugman 2009)

In the negotiations with Opel, too, the German government has evidently manoeuvred itself into a corner. Instead of coordinating with the other European countries with GM-owned sites, all our government cares about is the traditional German Opel brand. Meanwhile, Great Britain, Spain and Poland are apparently offering financial support that would not protect only Opel, but also their own GM sites. That could make the attempt to carve only Opel out of the GM group considerably more difficult, however.

At a different level however, the Europeans do stick together: during the UNO conference on the world crisis at the end of June in New York, the OECD nation, led by the USA and the EU, blocked a few effective rules for the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank that would have provided relief for the poorest countries in the world.

Birgit Daiber, RLF Brussels